Dr. Seuss's works are classic to many people, from books like Green Eggs and Ham to The Cat in the Hat. These books have a charm to them that no other person can replicate, and also makes them an amusing read. The rhyme scheme and unique art make is all that more fun to read. Most of these works are very hard to adapt properly. When I heard the studio who made Despicable Me was going to adapt Dr. Seuss's The Lorax, I could not help but to get excited, due the fact I absolutely loved Despicable Me. So, how does it fair off in my mind?
The plot is a simple one, I will admit. It follows the story of a young boy named Ted, who lives in a town where there is no nature; everything is synthetic and artificial. His romantic interest, Audrey, starts to tell him how she wants to see a real tree, and inspired to try and gain her love, he goes on a quest to get a tree.
To be quite honest, I actually hated this movie. The plot was so ridiculous that it made me cry. Yes, I do understand that they have never seen real trees, and this girl wants to see one, but the consequences of him trying to get the tree were quite ridiculous. Also, the one person who can tell him how to get a tree, the Once-ler, makes him jump through hoops in order to get the tree. I guess they needed to fill up about another forty-five minutes discussing why the trees were gone.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj5L6aqQOt_q6YdkE1rKeVzibOwuJc_Qk1_57Zh-7PgmNVZyXKQSFJEXSTb1vzKCN6WRpWHNg87u6OgEBNofkwCJ38qVe3fXw1sVdaO88H5n6MojT1377uLbuzaZxYKesut2aomCMJuAJE/s320/Dr-Seuss-The-Lorax+(6).jpg)
The animation was well done in the sceneries aspect. They were well done, vibrant, and fit the upbeat mood of the movie very well. The character designs were well done, and they also blended well with the back ground. However, I did go see this in 3D (not IMAX), and I feel like although I could tell the levels of depth, the 3D really did not work for me. It seemed to be lacking, but since it is not IMAX, I will give it some lee-way.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiXI4-dezrhL6bBfvP2Q1DyBwMJAQEho4si5IlEY-oPHX_nCJxMn_4qlXZ29AnQGUaUz-PSM17U0XpTHBqhaUF3Y1h_5i5UoaDeZUeAwLBllJ0IqrvK81xC0gAp38Yg2AG-CfZEq88hQ0U/s320/TheLoraxTrees.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgqeAThcBe-xvzeQLCjQ3BtC14_CLnEabUp6jfO8-c-Qq4RijTGOTuV62qRYZu4HAa97z6gCdNogc2e8Iry1gm_lvmR9ci8nv4J6j3PG-j3k1mZEGrZulmiKF3DoAIaQ_i02l7PXcAU6fU/s320/The-Lorax-2012-Movie-Image-8.jpg)
The message that the movie incorporated in it was a common message that is popping up over and over again in movies: Protect the environment. While yes, I do agree that we need to take care of it, I think the movie industry is going overboard with this message. This movie is perfect example, because they exploited it in the wrong way. The Once-ler destroyed the trees for a stupid, useless scarf-thing. I think if they are going to propaganda saving the environment and not ruin it because of human actions, I think they could have done it a bit better. Since this is a kids movie, I guess they just wanted to make sure kids understood it, and could act on not destroying the trees, however, they must be assuming their audience is a bunch of dimwits.
Overall, unless you were a little kid, I would not recommend this movie to anyone but little kids, or unless you were super keen on saving the environment, and even then, it's a terrible movie.
I can honestly say I enjoyed your review more than the movie. Good work!
ReplyDeleteThank you :3
Delete